Security awareness
The core programme for all staff: phishing, social engineering, credentials, data handling and — most importantly — how to report something without being blamed for it.
Training & Awareness
Annual click-through training changes nothing and everybody involved knows it. What changes behaviour is a session built around your systems, your data and the things your staff are actually asked to do.
The standard programme is a generic video, an annual deadline and a completion percentage reported to an auditor. It satisfies a control. It does not change what anybody does, because it was not designed to — it was designed to be evidenced.
Training works when it is specific. A finance team learns far more from a walkthrough of a real invoice-redirection attempt against a company like theirs than from a module about "social engineering". Developers learn more from finding an authorisation flaw in code that looks like their own codebase than from a slide listing the OWASP Top 10. Executives engage with a briefing about what happened to a peer organisation and what the board was asked in the aftermath.
We build sessions from real material: findings from assessments we have run, attacks we have seen against organisations in your sector, and the systems your people actually use. It takes more preparation than playing a video, and it is the only version that produces a measurable change in how people behave when something looks wrong.
Coverage
Delivered on-site across Tamil Nadu and remotely across India. Sessions are sized to the audience, from a one-hour board briefing to a two-day developer workshop.
The core programme for all staff: phishing, social engineering, credentials, data handling and — most importantly — how to report something without being blamed for it.
Realistic campaigns run against agreed populations, reported in aggregate with a follow-up session. Measured on reporting rate, not just click rate, because reporting is the behaviour that actually helps.
Hands-on labs in your languages: authorisation, injection, cryptography, secrets and dependency risk, using vulnerable code that resembles your own.
For engineering and platform teams: identity, permission design, secrets, logging and the configuration mistakes that cause most cloud incidents.
Tabletop exercises for the people who would actually be in the room, run against a scenario relevant to your business, with the decision points made explicit.
ISO 27001, DPDP Act and GDPR obligations translated into what each role must do differently, which is the only version anybody retains.
Ninety minutes on the threat landscape for your sector, your current position and the questions a director should be asking.
Targeted sessions for finance, HR, support and administrators — the roles that are attacked specifically because of what they can access.
Approach
Most clients start with a baseline simulation and an all-staff session, then add role-based modules over the following quarter.
A phishing simulation before any training, to establish where you actually are. The result is reported as a number, never as a list of names.
Curriculum built from your systems, your sector’s real incidents and findings from your own assessments where you are happy for them to be used.
Live sessions, on-site or remote, with real material and time for the questions people only ask once they trust the room.
Developer labs, tabletop drills and follow-up simulations, because a single session is an event rather than a programme.
Reporting rate, time to report, repeat susceptibility and lab completion — measures that indicate behaviour rather than attendance.
Short quarterly refreshers and onboarding material for new starters, so the position does not decay back to where it started.
Deliverables
The report is the product. If it cannot be acted on by a developer and understood by a director, we have not finished.
Delivered by practitioners who do the testing, not by trainers reading a deck.
Aggregate reporting with trend over time, and never a list of individuals to be disciplined.
Attendance, content and outcomes documented in the form an ISO 27001 auditor expects.
Vulnerable code and exercises your team keeps, for onboarding new developers.
Short sessions that hold the baseline rather than letting it decay.
Is this for you?
If none of them are, say so on the call and we will tell you honestly whether this is the right piece of work — or point you at the one that is.
Book a scoping callHow we work
The same engagement model applies to every piece of work we take on, so you always know what happens next.
A 30-minute call, then a written scope: what is in, what is out, what we need from you and what it costs. Nothing starts before you sign it.
Rules of engagement, testing windows, escalation contacts and a signed authorisation. Out-of-hours windows where production cannot take the load.
Automated coverage first, then manual testing where judgement is required. Critical findings are reported the day we confirm them, not at the end.
One report a developer can act on and an executive can read, with evidence, reproduction steps, business impact and a fix for every finding.
A walkthrough call with your engineers. We answer questions on the fix, not just the finding.
A free retest cycle to confirm the fixes hold, and a clean summary you can hand to a customer, auditor or board.
Questions
The questions clients actually ask during scoping. If yours is not here, ask it directly.
Yes. We deliver on-site across Coimbatore, Chennai and Tamil Nadu, and travel elsewhere in India for larger programmes. Remote delivery works well for awareness and executive sessions; developer labs and incident response drills are noticeably better in a room together, so we recommend on-site for those where it is practical.
Two rules, and we do not bend them. Results are reported in aggregate, never as a list of individuals — the moment people believe a simulation is a trap that gets them into trouble, they stop reporting real incidents, which is precisely the behaviour you need. And every simulation is followed by a session explaining what the campaign was, what the signals were and what to do next time. The measure that matters is how many people reported it, not how many clicked.
Yes, and it needs to be. Labs are built in the languages and frameworks your team actually uses, with vulnerable code that resembles your own patterns. Generic secure-coding training in a language nobody on the team writes is close to worthless. We cover the major stacks in common use — Java, .NET, JavaScript and TypeScript, Python, PHP, Go and mobile platforms.
Yes. We provide the evidence pack auditors ask for under Annex A control 6.3 — content, attendance, dates and outcome measures. Auditors have become noticeably more interested in whether training is effective rather than whether it happened, so the simulation trend data is often the more useful half of the pack.
Awareness sessions work well up to about eighty people; beyond that we run multiple sittings, because a session nobody asks questions in is a video with extra steps. Developer labs are capped at twenty so everyone gets hands-on time. Executive briefings are typically six to fifteen people.
Next step
A 30-minute call, then a scope document with what is in, what is out and what it costs. No obligation, and no charge for the conversation.